wpbc

Archive for October 2008

Studs Terkel, Chicago legend passes away

In chicago on October 31, 2008 at 9:31 pm

Studs Terkel, a beloved Chicago legend passed away today at 96 years of age. Here is his obituary from the Tribune, written by his friend Rick Kogan. Studs will be missed

UPDATE, Nov 2: ag asked who Studs Terkel was and that is a fair question. Studs wasn’t famous for obne reason. He was so many things during his life, so it probably depends on your age as to how you remember Terkel. He was a radio news man and talkhow host, an actor and television host, he was blacklisted by the McCarthyism of the early 50’s, so Terkel became a writer and ultimately oral historian for all things. Terkel was a larger than life figure in 20th century Chicago history. Below is a profile of Studs from Spartacus Educational:

After graduating from high school in 1928, Terkel went to the University of Chicago where he received a law degree in 1934. The following year he found work producing radio shows as part of the Federal Writers Project. Terkel, who now adopted the name Studs (after the hero in James Farrell’s novel, Studs Lonigan), also became involved in the Chicago Repertory Theatre.
After graduating from high school in 1928, Terkel went to the University of Chicago where he received a law degree in 1934. The following year he found work producing radio shows as part of the Federal Writers Project. Terkel, who now adopted the name Studs (after the hero in James Farrell’s novel, Studs Lonigan), also became involved in the Chicago Repertory Theatre.

In 1939 he married the social worker Ida Goldberg. The marriage was to last for 60 years. On the outbreak of the Second World War Terkel attempted to join the army but was rejected because of a perforated eardrum. He joined the Red Cross but he was not allowed to serve overseas. He later discovered that this was because of his left-wing political views.

During the 1940s Terkel became a familiar voice on radio working as a news commentator and disc jockey. He also acted and appeared on several television programmes. In 1949 Terkel began his own television show, Studs’ Place, an improvised sitcom where he played himself as a restaurant owner.

After being investigated by Joseph McCarthy and the House Un-American Activities Committee in 1953, his contract was cancelled. Terkel refused to give evidence against other left-wing activists and was therefore blacklisted and prevented from appearing on television.

Terkel eventually found employment with the Chicago Sunday Times where he wrote a regular jazz column. He also acted in various plays including John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men. In 1958 he started his long-running daily radio programme on WFMT, the Studs Terkel Show.

In the 1960s Terkel became interested in oral history. His first book on the subject, Division Street: America (1967), contained interviews with seventy people who had lived in Chicago. This was followed by Hard Times (1970), which featured interviews with Americans talking about their experiences of the Depression, and Working (1974), an account of people’s working lives.

Other books in the same style by Terkel include American Dreams: Lost and Found (1980), the Pulitzer Prize winning The Good War (1985), Chicago (1987), The Great Divide (1988), Race (1992), Coming of Age (1995), Talking to Myself: A Memoir of My Times (1995), My American Century (1998). Will the Circle be Unbroken?, a book about death, was published in 2001. This was followed by Hope Dies Last (2005), And They All Sang (2006), They All Sang (2007) and Touch and Go: A Memoir (2008).

Terkel has been described as a historian and a sociologist but he prefers to call himself a “guerrilla journalist with a tape recorder”. He created controversy when Tony Blair resigned and he asked: “Why was he such a house-boy for Bush?”

Studs Terkel died in his Chicago home on 31st October, 2008 at the age of ninety-six. He asked that his epitaph should be: “Curiosity did not kill this cat.”

Old Style will go back to being krausened

In beer on October 30, 2008 at 9:27 pm

Yesteday, I heard a rumor from a friend of mine in the beer biz that in the spring of 2009 a couple of changes will take place with the beer I drink at the Friendly Confines (and most summers evenings in the bunker watching the Cubs on tele) Old Style beer.

Piggy backing on the recent success of Schlitz going back to their 1960’s formula, Pabst Brewing Company is planning to do the same thing with Old Style. Old Style will go back to being ‘fully krausened’ as it was when I was a kid and first started drinking it. Old Style was fully krausened and brewed with Pure Artesian Spring Water all of the years that it was brewed up in LaCrosse. When Pabst Brewing Company decided to shut down all of their brewing operations, the beer went to a generic formula brewed at Miller. Well, that is about to change. So move over LaCrosse Lager, krausening is back.

The other change is going to be the pricing of the beer. Just like Schlitz did when they changed formulas, the brand will go up in price. Rumor has it the 30-packs will be a thing of the past and Old Style and OS Light will be priced in line with domestics like Budweiser and Miller. That may not play well in my household where I try use the price point as my excuse to by the Cubs longtime radio sponsor’s product. But something tells me, I’ll make cutbacks in other areas.

Phillies win 2nd World Series in franchise history

In mlb on October 30, 2008 at 2:12 am

Despite a 47 hour rain delay, the Phillies won game 5 by a 4-3 score. This win led to a 4-1 World Series victory that gave the Philadelphia Phillies their second championship in their long history. Congrats to the Phillies and their fans.

XCubFactor: former Cubs on the Phillies WS Championship Squad:


Jamie Moyer

Matt Stairs

and Scottie Eyre (MD’s new favorite person)

Sports and the global recession

In chicago cubs, mlb on October 28, 2008 at 3:26 am

In the world of sport the global recession is not only having an impact on the Cubs sale. The dependence on corporations to buy tickets to sporting events could have a major impact on all of the major professional sports. TIME had a great article on the recession and sports this week.

But those were the days of the $10 ticket, when professional sports was a very different business. Today, sports economics are inextricably tied to the fate of deep-pocketed corporations. Many sports facilities have been upgraded and located within gentrified business districts, and teams cater to high-end clientele through luxury suites, driving up prices for all fans. As workers see their savings erode, they will probably be less willing to pay stratospheric ticket prices, which fund the cartoonish salaries of sports stars. Likewise, companies that dish out millions for sponsorships won’t be able to justify sports-marketing expenditures to their shareholders. “The new model that has emerged over the last two decades is not going to hold up,” says Zimbalist. “It’s not conceivable that sports will be impervious to a downturn.”

As we’ve discussed here, Sam Zell waited too long to sell the Cubs:

The turmoil has already stalled the planned sale of the Chicago Cubs, and owner Sam Zell, CEO of the Tribune Company, should expect a less appealing bid. “This downturn makes deals harder to get done,” says Sal Galatioto, president of Galatioto Sports Partners, a consulting firm. “It’s more difficult to get debt to purchase a team, and that debt is more expensive.”

According to the TIME article, free agents should be concerened. They will not earn anywhere near what they expected:

But the strong revenue growth that baseball, football and basketball have enjoyed throughout the decade is clearly in jeopardy. After baseball crowns either the Phillies or the Tampa Bay Rays as world champions this month, its offseason will test the resilience of the sports economy. Will ticket purchases for 2009 drop? And will free agents command the same salaries? Legends like Los Angeles Dodgers outfielder Manny Ramirez, the prime catch in the free-agent market, will always break the bank. But don’t expect those left-handed middle relievers to score the same ludicrous contracts as in recent years. “Player salaries are extremely sensitive to market conditions,” says Stanford University economist Roger Noll. “These players are going to get paid less next year.” During the post-9/11, post-tech-bubble downturn earlier this decade, for instance, median baseball salaries dropped 10%.

Good luck fellas. Just be happy you have a job in these trying times. It will be real interesting to see the impact the economy has on ticket sales not only with the Cubs but with all MLB clubs next year.

More on the cubs sale

In chicago cubs on October 23, 2008 at 9:12 pm

The other day gm gave me his opinions on the sale of the Cubs. Well, in the interest of being ‘fair and balanced’ (lol), Mike Spellman has written an article for the Daily Herald that isn’t nearly as grim as the outlook from gm. Spellman interviews Eric Fisher from sportsjournal.com. Here are the highlights:

Timing of the sale

I would say rather than this thing getting done after the World Series – a November time-frame – if I had to hazard a guess, we’re probably looking at late winter right now, maybe early spring.

Price tag

I’ve heard everything from $800 million to $1.3 billion. I don’t see that number going down significantly at all. This is still a premier asset. It’s still something that’s generating a lot of interest and it’s something that doesn’t come up for sale very often. I don’t anticipate a lot of depression on that front.

Cuban

Originally, the conventional wisdom was no. That, as time has gone on, has ceased to be an issue. He had his earlier battles with (NBA commissioner) David Stern as owner of the Mavericks, but he really doesn’t get fined anymore. Stern has nothing but positive things to say about him and has communicated those thoughts to Bud Selig. It would be very interesting, though, to hear what (White Sox chairman) Jerry Reinsdorf has to say. He’s still feisty, but in a more constructive fashion. I don’t get the sense that he would be blocked out because he’s Mark Cuban.

My head is really spinning on this whole deal right now, and I’m just a fan of this ballclub. I’ll trt to keep this thing as up to date as possible as the story unfolds after the World Series, in the meantime this just looks like a guessing game for most anyone on the outside looking in.

WS game 1: balk or no balk?

In mlb on October 23, 2008 at 2:52 pm

The Phillies won game one of the 2008 World Series lastnight, behind a really good pitching performance by Cole Hamels. Hamels has been great in these playoffs. A play that really turned out to be big was Hamels pickoff of Carlos Pena in the bottom of the sixth. But was it a legal pickoff? Rays manager Joe Maddon didn’t think so.

 ”Timmy told me that he had stepped a bit towards first base, and my response was, ‘That may be true, but he also stepped towards home plate,’” Maddon said. “I thought it was clearly a balk, and obviously you can’t argue a balk. You can get kicked out arguing a balk. So even what I did was inappropriate. But nevertheless, I had to take that chance right there, because I was adamant that I thought he had balked.”

Timmy is home plate umpire Tim Welke. This brings to mind something I have always struggled with the balk rule and left handed pitchers. I have never umpired a ballgame, and you should thank the baseball gods for that. Watching alot of ball through the years, I have thought that lefthanders get away with balks on a high percentage of their pickoffs. The fact that a balk is a judgement call I guess makes this a real grey area. But here is the official rule:

Rule 8.05 (c)
The pitcher, while touching his plate, fails to step directly toward a base before throwing to that base.

Rule 8.05 (c) Comment: Requires the pitcher, while touching his plate, to step directly toward a base before throwing to that base. If a pitcher turns or spins off of his free foot without actually stepping or if he turns his body and throws before stepping, it is a balk.

A pitcher is to step directly toward a base before throwing to that base but does not require him to throw (except to first base only) because he steps. It is possible, with runners on first and third, for the pitcher to step toward third and not throw, merely to bluff the runner back to third; then seeing the runner on first start for second, turn and step toward and throw to first base. This is legal. However, if, with runners on first and third, the pitcher, while in contact with the rubber, steps toward third and then immediately and in practically the same motion “wheels” and throws to first base, it is obviously an attempt to deceive the runner at first base, and in such a move it is practically impossible to step directly toward first base before the throw to first base, and such a move shall be called a balk. Of course, if the pitcher steps off the rubber and then makes such a move, it is not a balk.

I think good lefthanders can make this a real difficult call for the umpires. That is what Hamels did lastnight. From my perch in my living room I agreed with Maddon, but I have always felt lefthanders balk on pickoff moves.

q&a with gaius marius on cubs sale

In chicago cubs on October 21, 2008 at 6:52 pm

Well, it was just like old times when I exchanged a few emails with my old 1060west pal gaius marius recently. For those of you who don’t know, gm follows the markets for a living. He understands the financial crises better than anybody I know.

I exchanged a few emails with gm and got his take on how the financial crises (yes, he answered in lowercase) will impact the sale of the Cubs…all I can say is good luck Sam Zell.

———————————
wpbc: We first heard the Cubs were for sale on Opening Day 2007. It is now October 2008. Why has this process taken so long?

gm: short answer: the credit crunch. tribune would certainly like to sell the cubs — or, for that matter, a lot of their assets, as they are failing and need cash desperately — but the parties that were last year interested in buying the team could under no circumstances actually finance the purchase of the team on reasonable terms today.

wpbc: A couple weeks ago Mark Cuban was in town and he mentioned that the banks may not be able to close this sort of deal, he said: “Even if we wanted to close the day after tomorrow, the banks might not be able to close.” Is that true? If so, do you see there being anyway a deal like this can be done in the next 6-12 months?

gm: yes it’s true — there’s no “might” about it — and no i don’t see a deal in the next year — at least not one attractive to tribune. i think that the window was open and it is now shut.

if i may prognosticate — expect the major money center banks that would last year have financed this deal to, sometime in the next 18 months or so, be explicitly nationalized by the federal government. citibank, jpmorgan, bank of america — despite what popular perception may be, none of them are likely to survive without being taken over and restructured by uncle sam. so far from taking on new loan risk, these banks will be finding ways to sell off their assets and hoard cash (including what they were just given by the treasury last week) to hold against loan losses already in the pipeline as recession deepens. and even that will very probably not be enough. the banks are in the process of being broken.

wpbc: Sam Zell wants this deal to be highly leveraged to avoid a huge tax bill, can you explain to me in simple terms how this works and how it helps the Trib avoid taxes? If somebody offers cash, is that a bad deal for Zell?

gm: zell is one of the american demigods of tax avoidance, and he reportedly wants a deal very much like the one used in his sale of newsday. as i’ve seen it explained in fortune — let’s say he finds a buyer for the team at $800mm. tribune would then put the cubs into a partnership, into which the buyer would also put $820mm of promissory notes (corporate IOUs). the partnership would then borrow $800mm using the notes as collateral, and would then pay that as a “distribution” from the partnership to tribune.

the result is that the trib would end up with $800mm in cash (and a very small residual interest in the cubs), the buyer ends up with almost all the interest in the cubs and a big loan to repay — which, by the rules to maintain the tax advantage, they could not start paying off for nearly ten years. chances are the team revenues would have to finance the debt service for that period. the cash transfer to tribune is supposedly a “distribution” from a leveraged partnership — and NOT proceeds from a sale — and therefore is nontaxable, saving tribune something like $250mm in taxes. the IRS is already sniffing around the newsday deal, though, so while it would save the trib from having to pay now they may have to pay when the feds catch up. of course, “someday” the trib may be bankrupt.

i see even tribune itself ran a story today on MLB’s wariness of such a deal structure. they have fish to fry as well, and don’t want to raise government hackles amid a financial crisis. and there’s the difficulty of being able to raise such a loan right now.

it isn’t a “bad” deal if the cubs were straightforwardly bought from tribune — that’s how most everybody does it — but it is a difference of hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes because tribune’s cost basis on the cubs is so small ($25mm, iirc) and therefore their capital gain so large.

wpbc: The Tribune needs this deal to go through, because they have $600 million on a loan coming due in June, will this deal be done by that time? If not, do you think they can move other assets?

gm: i expect tribune will default. even if the staggering banks were to recover their footing somehow, financing leveraged buyouts (of ballclubs, no less!) is not on the to-do list. and tribune will have a LOT of company — current credit-default swap indexes of leveraged loan deals (ie, bets placed on the likelihood of default on loans of the kind tribune took on when zell bought them) are currently indicating that 73% of all such loans will default next year. think about that for a moment. and further consider that zell’s tribune deal was one of the most highly levered, and into one of the most damaged and vulnerable industries in the corporate universe.

wpbc: The Tribune is now going to keep a bigger stake in the team. Is this a result of them needing to get some money from this sale to pay down their debt?

gm: it may simply be a result of the tax avoidance scheme mentioned above. they would retain a small slice of the partnership that owns the team as a natural consequence of such a transaction. characterizing it as some sort of rooting interest in the hometown club is pure spin for public consumption.

wpbc: On the field(sort of), do you see the Cubs continuing to spend money this offseason?

gm: the cubs aren’t reliant on tribune for their cash flow, so i don’t see why they can’t operate as a self-contained unit — provided, of course, that tribune doesn’t start diverting cash to help pay for operations in the larger scheme. and that is possible, of course, as tribune is in very dire straits. it may not be likely, but i would rule nothing out — including perhaps even an attempted sale of players for cash. tribune’s problems are considerable.

wpbc: In your opinion? When does the deal finally get done? Who buys the Cubs? How much?

gm: that answer is likely to be intimately tied up with the return to health for the banks, and that is not a question i or anyone has an answer to. there’s also the question of what would happen if the tribune went belly up and was restructured or liquidated. from my perspective, it’s an unanswerable question. but i will suggest (as i did back on 1060w) that the deal size is probably declining steeply — we are experiencing a serious asset deflation in the united states for the first time since the 1930s as a stunning excess of borrowed money is wrung out of the system, and ballclubs are no more immune than houses and used cars.

wpbc: Thanks man, I’ll pimp your blog.
———————————
I’d like to thank my good friend gm for taking time out to answer these questions. As you can see this is a very complex situation. Zell may have waited his way into a real pickle not selling the team at the end of 2007 as was the original plan. I promised to pimp his blog, so here is a link to gm’s blog.

4 more years…

In chicago cubs on October 20, 2008 at 6:38 pm

…well depending on what the new owner thinks. But that’s the plan anyways, as Jim Hendry received a real nice vote of confidence from Crane Kenney and whoever else is running the Cubs these days (outside of Kenney I have no idea who is making business decisions like this for the Cubs).

This was the right move for the Cubs moving forward. As critical as I once was of Hendry, the last two seasons have silenced even me. maybe my criticism at that time was more suited for Andy MacPhail. You see once the sweatervest left the cubs front office, things have gotten much, much better. Hendry has gone from a bonehead to a shrewd gm with a winning track record. Funny how that has happened.

The Cubs have long been an organization that lacked stability. That changed when MacPhail arrived in the 90’s. I’m not sure his stability was good, but at least it showed this organization could think in a bigger picture, and not year-to-year. Now with Hendry the Cubs have stability and an experienced gm that knows the system and the landscape of playing baseball on the northside of Chicago better than any gm in this franchises sad history. Hendry has turned the corner and this organization now expects to win. That was unthinkable a few seasons ago.

The extension for Hendry was the right thing to do at the right time.

Team with $43 million payroll makes world series

In mlb on October 20, 2008 at 4:16 am

For years we have heard fans bitch and moan that baseball was unfair to the small market clubs because they don’t use the communist revenue sharing model that the NFL and NBA have made popular. Fans of almost every small-market team at one time or another have used this crap as an excuse. Well, there is nothing valid about that excuse. Tonight the Tampa Rays with the second lowest payroll in all of baseball, won the AL pennant. Congrats to them and the six fans that showed up on Opening Day.

1. NY Yankees 207,108,489
2. NY Mets 137,391,376
3. Detroit 137,290,196
4. Boston 133,220,112
5. Chicago Sox 121,189,332
6. LA Angels 118,825,333
7. LA Dodgers 118,188,536
8. Chicago Cubs 117,954,333
9. Seattle 116,876,482
10. Atlanta 102,849,666
11. St. Louis 99,624,449
12. Toronto 97,001,500
13. Philadelphia 95,479,880
14. Houston 88,930,414
15. Cleveland 78,970,066
16. San Francisco 76,194,000
17. Milwaukee 74,687,499
18. Cincinnati 74,117,695
19. San Diego 72,626,616
20. Colorado 68,655,500
21. Baltimore 66,806,249
22. Texas 66,312,326
23. Arizona 66,202,712
24. Kansas City 57,855,500
25. Minnesota 56,932,766
26. Washington 54,166,000
27. Pittsburgh 48,689,783
28. Oakland 47,167,126
29. Tampa Bay 43,422,997
30. Florida 22,650,000

I should rant about the ineptitude of the Chicago Cubs, but that no longer is fun. I have watched too many of these expansion clubs be founded and make the World Series, while the Cubs just continue along a pattern of futility and failure. Someday Las Vegas will get a team, I have no doubt that team will play in the World Series before the Cubs do.

So we have a Phillies/Rays World Series. I expect the layoff will have an impact on the Phils. I think this Tampa team might be destiny’s darlings this season. Rays in 5. VIVA SMALL MARKETS!

Gene Wojciechowski on Mark Cuban buying Cubs

In chicago cubs on October 18, 2008 at 7:53 pm

An interesting interview on MarketPlace with Chicago writer Gene Wojciechowski giving his take on Marke Cuban purchasing the Chicago Cubs:

marketplace_cast1_20081016_64&starttime=00:19:41.8&endtime=00:23:29.0

OLNEY: Peavy has five teams in mind

In chicago cubs on October 18, 2008 at 2:51 am

According to ESPN’s Buster Olney the Cubs are one of five teams San Diego ace Jake Peavy would approve a deal to:

San Diego pitcher Jake Peavy, the Cy Young Award winner currently being dangled in trade talks, initially indicated to the Padres that he would prefer a deal to one of five teams — Atlanta, St. Louis, the Chicago Cubs, the Los Angeles Dodgers and Houston Astros.

But because San Diego apparently isn’t close to honing in on a deal with any of those five, sources say that the Padres are reaching out to other teams, as well.
peavy downs some jager

peavy downs some jager

Keep this guy away from the Astros or Cardinals at all costs. If I am the Cubs, I’d like to see if there is a way into these sweepstakes. I know the Cubs minor league talent is not plentiful these days, but still there has to be a combination of players that could get this deal done for the Northsiders. Peavy at the front-end of the Cubs rotation would be a flat-out stud.

It’s official: a century of futility

In chicago cubs on October 15, 2008 at 2:31 am

Jack Brickhouse probably never knew how right he was when he used to joke “any team can have a bad century” when he joked about the misfortune of the Chicago National League club. These days that bad century is a reality. It became official this afternoon when it became 100 years since the Cubs (in those days they weren’t even Northsiders) closed out the Tigers at Bennett Park in front of 6,210 fans in a game that took 1 hour 25 minutes to play. Orval Overall went the distance for the Cubs, in a game that had two umpires. It really was a different era when the Cubs were winning championships. Thanks to the great page that is Retrosheet.org, here is the boxscore:

Chicago Cubs 2, Detroit Tigers 0

Day

World Series Game 5 Played on Wednesday, October 14, 1908 (D) at Bennett Park

CHI N    1  0  0    0  1  0    0  0  0  -   2 10  0
DET A    0  0  0    0  0  0    0  0  0  -   0  3  0

BATTING
Chicago Cubs                 AB   R   H RBI      BB  SO      PO   A
Sheckard lf                   3   0   1   0       1   0       2   0
Evers 2b                      4   1   3   1       0   0       2   3
Schulte rf                    3   0   1   0       0   0       0   0
Chance 1b                     4   0   3   1       0   0      11   0
Steinfeldt 3b                 2   0   0   0       1   1       0   3
Hofman cf                     4   0   0   0       0   2       2   0
Tinker ss                     4   0   1   0       0   0       1   4
Kling c                       3   1   0   0       1   0       9   2
Overall p                     2   0   1   0       0   0       0   0
Totals                       29   2  10   2       3   3      27  12

BATTING - 
2B: Evers (1,off Donovan).
SH: Overall (1,off Donovan); Steinfeldt (2,off Donovan); Schulte (2,off Donovan).
Team LOB: 6.

BASERUNNING - 
CS: Steinfeldt (1,2nd base by Donovan/Schmidt); Evers (2,Home by Donovan/Schmidt).

Detroit Tigers               AB   R   H RBI      BB  SO      PO   A
McIntyre lf                   3   0   1   0       1   0       2   0
O'Leary ss                    4   0   0   0       0   1       2   2
Crawford cf                   4   0   1   0       0   1       3   0
Cobb rf                       3   0   0   0       1   1       1   0
Rossman 1b                    4   0   0   0       0   2       7   3
Schaefer 2b                   3   0   0   0       1   2       4   1
Schmidt c                     4   0   0   0       0   2       5   4
Coughlin 3b                   3   0   1   0       0   0       2   1
Donovan p                     2   0   0   0       1   1       1   1
Totals                       30   0   3   0       4  10      27  12

FIELDING - 
DP: 2. Schmidt-Schaefer-Schmidt, O'Leary-Rossman-Coughlin.

BATTING - 
2B: McIntyre (1,off Overall).
Team LOB: 7.

BASERUNNING - 
SB: Donovan (1,2nd base off Overall/Kling).
CS: Schaefer (1,2nd base by Overall/Kling).

PITCHING
Chicago Cubs                 IP     H   R  ER  BB  SO  HR
Overall W(2-0)                9     3   0   0   4  10   0

WP: Overall (1).

Detroit Tigers               IP     H   R  ER  BB  SO  HR
Donovan L(0-2)                9    10   2   2   3   3   0

Umpires: HP - Jack Sheridan, 1B - Hank O'Day

Time of Game: 1:25   Attendance: 6210

It gets even cooler or crueler depending on how you want to look at it. Retrosheet provides the PBP of that ballgame:
CUBS 1ST: Sheckard popped to second; Evers singled to center;
Schulte singled to right [Evers to second]; Chance singled to
center [Evers scored, Schulte to second]; Steinfeldt flied out
to center; Hofman forced Schulte (third unassisted); 1 R, 3 H, 0
E, 2 LOB.  Cubs 1, Tigers 0.

TIGERS 1ST: McIntyre walked; O'Leary struck out; Crawford
singled to center [McIntyre to second]; Cobb struck out; Rossman
struck out but McIntyre advanced to third and Crawford advanced
to second and Rossman advanced to first on a wild pitch;
Schaefer struck out; 0 R, 1 H, 0 E, 3 LOB.  Cubs 1, Tigers 0.

CUBS 2ND: Tinker grounded out (third to first); Kling popped to
catcher in foul territory; Overall grounded out (first to
pitcher); 0 R, 0 H, 0 E, 0 LOB.  Cubs 1, Tigers 0.

TIGERS 2ND: Schmidt struck out; Coughlin grounded out (shortstop
to first); Donovan walked; Donovan stole second; McIntyre flied
out to center; 0 R, 0 H, 0 E, 1 LOB.  Cubs 1, Tigers 0.

CUBS 3RD: Sheckard popped to first; Evers popped to shortstop;
Schulte flied out to left; 0 R, 0 H, 0 E, 0 LOB.  Cubs 1, Tigers
0.

TIGERS 3RD: O'Leary grounded out (third to first); Crawford
grounded out (second to first); Cobb flied out to left; 0 R, 0
H, 0 E, 0 LOB.  Cubs 1, Tigers 0.

CUBS 4TH: Chance flied out to right; Steinfeldt walked;
Steinfeldt was caught stealing second (catcher to second);
Hofman struck out; 0 R, 0 H, 0 E, 0 LOB.  Cubs 1, Tigers 0.

TIGERS 4TH: Rossman struck out; Schaefer walked; Schmidt struck
out; Schaefer was caught stealing second (catcher to shortstop);
0 R, 0 H, 0 E, 0 LOB.  Cubs 1, Tigers 0.

CUBS 5TH: Tinker popped to shortstop; Kling walked; Overall out
on a sacrifice bunt (catcher to first) [Kling to second];
Sheckard walked; Evers doubled to center [Kling scored, Sheckard
to third]; Schulte grounded out (shortstop to first); 1 R, 1 H,
0 E, 2 LOB.  Cubs 2, Tigers 0.

TIGERS 5TH: Coughlin singled to left; Donovan struck out;
McIntyre doubled to right [Coughlin to third]; O'Leary flied to
center; Crawford struck out; 0 R, 2 H, 0 E, 2 LOB.  Cubs 2,
Tigers 0.

CUBS 6TH: On a bunt Chance singled; Steinfeldt out on a
sacrifice bunt (first unassisted) [Chance to second]; Hofman
flied out to left; Tinker lined to center; 0 R, 1 H, 0 E, 1 LOB.
 Cubs 2, Tigers 0.

TIGERS 6TH: Cobb walked; Rossman forced Cobb (shortstop to
second); Schaefer struck out; Schmidt popped to second; 0 R, 0
H, 0 E, 1 LOB.  Cubs 2, Tigers 0.

CUBS 7TH: Kling flied out to center; Overall singled to center;
Sheckard was credited with a single when a runner was hit by the
batted ball [Overall out at second (second unassisted)];
Sheckard was picked off first (pitcher to first to second); 0 R,
2 H, 0 E, 0 LOB.  Cubs 2, Tigers 0.

TIGERS 7TH: Coughlin grounded out (third to first); Donovan
grounded out (shortstop to first); McIntyre flied out to left; 0
R, 0 H, 0 E, 0 LOB.  Cubs 2, Tigers 0.

CUBS 8TH: Evers singled to first; Schulte out on a sacrifice
bunt (catcher to first) [Evers to second]; Chance singled to
left [Evers to third]; Steinfeldt struck out while Evers was
caught stealing home (catcher to second to catcher); 0 R, 2 H, 0
E, 1 LOB.  Cubs 2, Tigers 0.

TIGERS 8TH: O'Leary popped to first; Crawford grounded out
(second to first); Cobb grounded out (shortstop to first); 0 R,
0 H, 0 E, 0 LOB.  Cubs 2, Tigers 0.

CUBS 9TH: Hofman struck out; Tinker singled to right; Kling hit
into a double play (shortstop to first) [Tinker out at third
(first to third)]; 0 R, 1 H, 0 E, 0 LOB.  Cubs 2, Tigers 0.

TIGERS 9TH: Rossman grounded out (second to first); Schaefer
grounded out (third to first); Schmidt grounded out (catcher to
first); 0 R, 0 H, 0 E, 0 LOB.  Cubs 2, Tigers 0.

I guess it is what it is. Wait 'til next year for the 99th time.

Cubs sale slows

In chicago cubs on October 10, 2008 at 4:08 pm

Due to the financial crises that has the world on the edge of the d-word. There are many concerns for each of us. The least of which should be the Chicago Cubs. But as a fan of this team, I wonder about their future. Will they be getting away from Sam Zell and the Tribsters by the end of the year. Probably not according to one of the leading candidates to buy the club Mark Cuban. According to Cuban, who was in town for the Mavs/Bulls game, the deal will at least be slowed and has changed due to the financial events around the world.

TRIBUNE– Cuban: Financial crisis will slow Cubs sale
BRIGHT ONE– Cuban: Economy has slowed Cubs deal
REUTERS– Market turmoil may delay Cubs sales process
FORT WORTH STAR-TELEGRAM– Dallas Mavericks win, but baseball is the talk

At the very least the price has dropped. Meaning Sam Zell is no longer going to get the billion dollars he imagined getting for the Cubs, Wrigley Field, and the teams share in ComcastSportsNet. This from the Reuters story referenced above:

It’s going to impact price,” said one person close to the auction. “If they’re looking to get top dollar on the Cubs, they better wait.

“People are just not going to be willing to play when they don’t know where markets are, where credit markets are, where capital markets are, where the fans are going to be in terms of buying tickets,” added the person, who asked not to be identified as the sale is ongoing.

Sam Zell has putzed around with this deal for nearly two years. Well, they may have just gotten burned big time. The club will no longer fetch the ridiculous numbers ($1.3 billion) that were reported back in the summer. One begins to wonder if the Cubs will just go down with the sinking ship that is TribCo.

Kenney: “boom-and-bust cycle’s over”

In chicago cubs on October 8, 2008 at 2:24 am

…and Crane wasn’t talking about this country’s financial crises. He was talking about the club that he is CEO of the Chicago Cubs. This from Today’s Bright One:

”The boom-and-bust cycle’s over,” Cubs CEO Crane Kenney said, even before the Los Angeles Dodgers finished sweeping the Cubs out of the playoffs. ”I mean, that whole ‘get in in ‘98, drought until ‘03′ — that should be over.”

As quickly as the Cubs collapsed under their own expectations last week, the fact they were in the postseason in consecutive years was a 100-year first for the franchise.

Three first-place finishes in the 2000s matches the high for any decade in franchise history. And the returning core, along with anticipated additions, suggests another division-title run in 2009.

and the goal to be a major market power:

”And when it all works, this is what it looks like,” he said, referring to back-to-back postseasons and a 97-win season. ”It’s like the Braves. That’s the model — the Braves and the Red Sox and the Yankees. Play like a big market, flex your muscle like a big market and hopefully perform like one on the field.”

Great to hear from Kenney after the debacle. Still, I have to wonder if Kenney will have any sort of say in the budget for this team moving forward. The Cubs will hopefully finally be sold this offseason. I wonder if the new owner will feel the need to keep Crane around.

One of the challenges that will face the next owner is the fact that the three core players, Lee, Ramirez and Soriano, are getting up there in age. In 2009 Lee will turn 34, Soriano 33 and Ramirez 31. Different players decline at different times, but it will be important that these players continue to produce. Next year the Cubs will have $44.65 million tied up in these three ballplayers (and it will be $46.75 million in 2010). As frustrated as some fans were with Soriano and Ramirez in the playoffs and with Lee during the regular season, barring any sort of trade these players will be critical in any success this team has moving forward into the next several years.

curses, Cubs swept again in NLDS

In chicago cubs on October 5, 2008 at 5:28 am

The Chicago Cubs pissed all over themselves in the NLDS. They didn’t even compete in this series with the Dodgers. So a Cubs team that led the NL in wins during the regular season, ends the 2008 season after only 164 games. I don’t believe anymore in ‘next years’ or any of that bullshit associated with this franchise.

Despite the great regular season, the result is an absolute disappointment. Like every other Cubs club from the past 100 seasons, and like every Cub postseason this ends in defeat. Somehwere their is supposed to an optimistic view on this. I don’t know what or where that is. I have spent alot of my time and money following this team for most of my life. Losses like this series, make me question that.

Besides the ownership change coming up in about a month, I don’t much care what the Cubs do for next year. It won’t be enough. This franchise could suitup the 61 Yankees and in the Cub pinstripes they’d have fucked it up. But anyway…

Come January, this franchise will fill a downtown hotel with bunch of fans who will swear 2009 will be the year. Come February this franchise will set another alltime record on single game tickets. Come March the players and fans will show up in Mesa and talk of another dream season will be underway again. I guess in the land of Cub the sun will rise again.

The next time a member of the MSM takes time to criticize the Cubs fanbase, I hope they realize what the hell this fanbase has been through. This series is just symbolic of the frustration. 9 consecutive losses in the postseason. This franchise has won one postseason series since 1908. It has been an absolute joke. Cubs fans have every right to sit at the old ballpark quiet and full of dread. You know why. They’ve been trained to expect just that.

This franchise is shitty.

NLDS Game 2: Cubs and Big Z face a must win ballgame

In chicago cubs on October 2, 2008 at 10:31 pm

Well, the 2008 season comes down to this. The Cubs and Dodgers will go at it at 8:37ct tonite. The Cubs have to win to keep from going down 2 game to none with a flight to LA in a best of five series.  

Carlos Zambrano has had an up and down second half of the season. So much so that the Cubs Opening Day starter was wasn’t given the first start in the playoffs, in favor of their new ace (tongue in cheek) Ryan Dempster. So the hopes and dreams of many a Cub fan rest on the right arm of Zambrano (and maybe his stick too).

I’ll be watching this one at home and will have some tweets over at the wpbc twitter page.

NLDS: Cub fans have seen this act before

In chicago cubs on October 2, 2008 at 7:43 pm

This morning I woke up and turned on the Cubs flagship radio station WGN radio. I a snip of Dave Kaplan ranting on the postgame show about the fans. He complained that Wrigley Field became a morgue following the 5th inning grand slam by the Dodgers James Loney. So I turned over to the Score, which happens to be the White Sox flagship, they had a writer from LA on who also said the Wrigley Field Cub fans “sat on their hands” last night.

To all of this I say: what the hell were the fans supposed to be cheering. In a 7-2 drubbing, there really are not alot of opportunities to stand up and get excited. The Cubs played a real shitty game. They have now lost 7 playoff games in a row. You will have to excuse those of us fans who have the feeling of ‘here we go again’. That is only a natural feeling to have when you have followed this team through postseason failure after postseason failure. Excuse those fans that don’t want to hold hands and sing a verse of ‘Go Cubs Go’ while their favorite team is falling apart in front of their eyes.

Tweeting NLDS Game One

In chicago cubs on October 1, 2008 at 6:03 pm

Click here for the wpbc twitter page. I’ll be tweeting live from in and around 1060 West Addison before/during/after the ballgame. I’m nervous as all hell about this ballgame, but their is nothing I can do. I’ll be there drinking Old Style and rooting the boys on. Hopefully this will be a joyous start to the NLDS.

On your marks get set…

In chicago cubs on October 1, 2008 at 2:25 pm

Well, it all begins in earnest tonite. There is alot of talk of this being ‘the year’, and all the normal shenanigans that come with the Chicago Cubs being in the playoffs. Well I have made the mistake of getting caught up in that hope in the past. Not this time. I’m not going to make any sort of predictions on this thing.

You can go all over the net and see what the so-called experts and the idiots think about this series. This sort of thing is repeated by most Cubs sites throughout the net. You won’t find that here. I am too nervous to look at stats/matchups or any of that stuff, not becuase I don’t believe in them, but because in a short series these things tend to be overblown and really don’t mean as much.

The one thing I will say is a team needs GOOD LUCK to get through the playoffs. That is something that historically we know very little about. As sports fans it is not really accepted to talk about the role that luck plays in winning a championship. But when you get down to a final 8 scenario, luck can play a critical role. So dust off all of your good luck charms. Your lucky hat, that rabbits foot, that lucky horseshoe, whatever you think can get this done. The Cubs will need to get a few breaks to go their way. This team needs all of the good karma they can come up with.

This afternoon/evening looks like a real good day to pitch. It will be in the low fifties and game time and the temp will fall as the sun sets.